Decision tree
Strategy & decisionsField guide · Strategy & decisions · 2 of 6
Which choice, given the chances of what follows each?
A decision tree branches left to right from a choice: a square where someone decides, a circle where something beyond their control turns out one way or another, and a branch for each choice or outcome, each path ending in the value of its result.
| Mark | Drawn as | Stands for | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| decision node | a small square | a point where the decision maker chooses one of several courses of action | Harvard, Decision node; Middleton §14.1 |
| chance node | a small circle | a point where one of several events beyond the decision maker’s control takes place, or becomes known | Harvard, Chance node; Middleton §14.1 |
| end | a small triangle, or a branch’s bare end when drawn by hand | the end of one path of decisions and events | Harvard, Terminal node; Middleton §14.1 |
| branch | a line with its choice or event written on it, and a probability on each chance branch | one choice or one event; a node’s branches exclude one another and cover every case | Middleton §14.1 |
| payoff | a number or words at a path’s end | the value of that path’s result | Middleton §14.2 |
A line with an arrowhead
Section titled “A line with an arrowhead”No line on a decision tree has an arrowhead: each branch is one choice or one outcome, read left to right in the order the decision maker learns of them, not necessarily the order in which events happen. An effect produces a change in the variable at its head; a branch leads to the next node and changes nothing, and the probabilities on a circle’s branches add up to one. Howard and Matheson’s influence diagram, from decision analysis, shows the same decisions and chances as boxes and circles in one graph without loops; its lines into a chance node need not mean cause, and it is not the influence map.
Cutting hay before forecast rain
Section titled “Cutting hay before forecast rain”The farmer’s question is Rankin and Undersander’s: the hay is ready to cut, but rain is forecast. In Collins’s Wisconsin trial, alfalfa rained on after a day’s curing lost 22% of its dry matter, against 6.3% for hay cured dry, and rained-on hay can lose 6 to 40% of its digestibility. The probabilities and the waiting branch’s end are illustrative.
When to draw one
Section titled “When to draw one”Draw one where a choice leads to uncertain events, or to further choices, and each path’s result can be valued: ACCA teaches the tree for a series of business decisions, and Harvard’s School of Public Health for clinical ones.
When not to draw one
Section titled “When not to draw one”Where the better choice is plain once the paths are written down, a sentence states it. Where no one can estimate the probabilities, which ACCA lists among the method’s limits, a tree’s expected values rest on guesses. Howard and Matheson found the tree’s order rarely the order in which a decision maker’s information is best assessed, and drew an influence diagram instead.
Reasoning and polish
Section titled “Reasoning and polish”- One decision with distinct outcomes
- Chance nodes, probabilities, costs and payoffs
- Expected values, sensitivity, information value and staged options
Related types
Section titled “Related types”No type is listed as related to this one.
Sources
Section titled “Sources”- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Glossary, teaching pack Building Decision Trees, on the decision tree and its decision, chance and terminal nodes.
- Mike Middleton, “Introduction to Decision Trees”, chapter 14 of his text on decision analysis with TreePlan (2007), §§14.1–14.2, on nodes and branches, their order, and terminal values.
- ACCA, “Decision trees”, technical article, on drawing left to right, when to draw one, and estimating probabilities.
- Ronald A. Howard and James E. Matheson, “Influence Diagrams”, Decision Analysis 2, no. 3 (2005): 127–143, §§7 and 10, on the decision tree’s order and the influence diagram.
- Mike Rankin and Daniel Undersander, “Rain Damage to Forage During Hay and Silage Making”, Focus on Forage 2, no. 4 (University of Wisconsin, 2000), for the figure’s decision and losses, as read on 10 October 2026.