Chapter 4: Loops That Amplify, Loops That Correct
Drafted for Aryeh's edit.
For chapter 4: Loops That Amplify, Loops That Correct
Timing
Section titled “Timing”- Reading the chapter: about 11 minutes, its 1,594 words of prose at 150 words a minute. Not counted in those minutes: 4 figures, 1 pair, 3 understanding checks, the reading exercise and the exercises.
- A session: 50 minutes, the exercises set for it. (estimate)
- Afterwards: 60 minutes, the exercises set for then. (estimate)
Common misreadings
Section titled “Common misreadings”- A variable named as an action, an event or a change. The bad diagram’s three names, stock the shelves, order groceries and receive the delivery, fail the more test; in the lab, each such name raises a notice under Names, with every check passed. Three of the four choices in the understanding check under Variables are such names.
- A balancing loop read as a good outcome, as
+is read as good and−as bad. In the reading’s third question a balancing loop comes to dominate and overdose deaths rise; the choice overdose deaths fall, since a balancing loop corrects the problem is this misreading. - A loop’s kind judged by its purpose, or by most of its effects. The lab’s parity check reports a loop whose declared kind disagrees with its count of
−effects, showing the count. Wrong choices in the understanding check under The parity rule (most of its effects are +) and in the reading’s first question (a call to 911 is made to bring overdose deaths down) read a loop this way. - A one-way chain where the situation closes a loop. Booth Sweeney and Sterman (2007) found open-loop, one-way causal thinking common among middle school students and teachers. In CL 01, a chain that never returns to its start leaves Close one loop unmet.
- Delays left out, and a balancing loop expected to settle smoothly. The same study found explanations without time delays. A smooth rise, a choice in the understanding check about soup on a slow stove, is this expectation; in CL 03, Put a delay on building starts → housing stock stays unmet without one.
Exercises to set
Section titled “Exercises to set”The session goes from one loop of each kind through a published diagram to two coupled loops; delays, a leverage point and the case come afterwards.
For a session
- CL 01 · A riverbank cleanup that grows by word of mouth, 10 minutes (estimate)
- CL 02 · Hunger and eating, 10 minutes (estimate)
- Reading · Overdoses, calls to 911 and burnout, redrawn, 10 minutes (estimate)
- CL 04 · A friendship group that grows until gatherings feel crowded, 20 minutes (estimate)
Afterwards
- CL 03 · A housing shortage and the building boom that overshoots it, 15 minutes (estimate)
- CL 05 · Borrowing to get to the end of the month, 20 minutes (estimate)
- CS 04 · Kelsham Primary School: funding that follows its pupils, 25 minutes (estimate)
Sources
Section titled “Sources”- Chapter 4, Loops That Amplify, Loops That Correct: its bad diagram, understanding checks, reading and exercises, and the lab’s checks on them.
- L. Booth Sweeney and John D. Sterman, “Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems”, System Dynamics Review 23, no. 2–3 (2007): 285–311, on open-loop thinking and explanations without time delays among middle school students and teachers.